Relies on rememberingDoesn't rely on remembering
Bigger typical-vs-perfect gapSmaller gap

This page is a comparison, not a recommendation — the right method depends on health history, side effect tolerance, whether STI protection matters for a given relationship, and plans around future pregnancy, all of which is a conversation for a doctor, not an article. What this page can do is lay out the actual landscape so that conversation starts from an informed place.

Typical use vs. perfect use

Every effectiveness figure below has two numbers. Perfect use is the failure rate under ideal, error-free conditions in clinical studies. Typical use reflects real-world use, including missed doses, inconsistent application, and ordinary human error. The gap between the two numbers tells you something important: it's largest for methods that depend on remembering or applying something correctly every single time, and smallest for methods that don't depend on user action at all once they're in place.

The comparison

MethodTypical-use failure ratePerfect-use failure rateSTI protection
No method~85%~85%None
Withdrawal~20%~4%None
Fertility awareness methods~2-23% (varies by method)~0.4-5%None
External condom~13%~2%Significant reduction, not elimination
Internal condom~21%~5%Significant reduction, not elimination
Combined pill / patch / ring~7%<1%None
Birth control shot (Depo)~4%<1%None
Implant<1%<1%None
Hormonal IUD<1%<1%None
Copper IUD<1%<1%None
Vasectomy~0.15%~0.1%None
Tubal ligation~0.5%~0.5%None

These figures are the commonly cited public-health reference numbers used across major health organizations' contraceptive-effectiveness tables (based on the widely published Trussell contraceptive failure rate data). They're population-level statistics, not a prediction for any individual — actual results depend heavily on correct, consistent use for the methods where that matters.

Almost nothing on this list protects against STIs except condoms — and even condoms don't eliminate that risk entirely. Most hormonal and long-acting methods are pregnancy prevention only. A lot of people reasonably combine a highly effective method for pregnancy prevention with condoms for STI protection — see our STI prevention guide.

Go deeper on a specific method

Common questions worth their own answer

Not medical advice: this page is a general comparison, not personalized guidance — health history, medications, and individual risk factors all affect which methods are actually appropriate for a given person. See our medical disclaimer.

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between "typical use" and "perfect use"?

Perfect use is the failure rate under ideal, consistent, error-free conditions in clinical studies. Typical use reflects how a method performs in real life, including missed doses, inconsistent use, and human error. The gap between the two is largest for methods that depend on remembering or applying something correctly every time, and smallest for methods that don't depend on user action at all.

Which method is "the most effective"?

The methods with the lowest typical-use failure rates are the ones that don't rely on remembering to do anything: IUDs, the implant, and permanent methods like vasectomy and tubal ligation. That's a structural feature of the method, not a judgment about anyone's ability to use other methods correctly.

Can two methods be combined?

Yes, and it's common — for example, a hormonal method for pregnancy prevention alongside condoms for STI protection, since most hormonal and long-acting methods don't protect against STIs at all. A doctor can help figure out a combination that fits.

Get one practical guide a week

Positions, honest toy reviews, and advice that treats you like an adult. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.